On Saturday 26 May 2007 12:40:54 Uwe Bugla wrote: > Yes! This sort of mistakes is completely impossible, as I use to work with > aliases rather than IP adresses. The machine I tried to ping (i. e. my > router) is called Jerry (as a reminiscence to Mr. "Captan Trips" from > Grateful Dead), and thus "ping jerry" returned the following: > > "destination host unreachable" > > Above that, I state for the second time now that I reverted your patches in > 2.6.22-rc2-mm1 with the effect that everything worked perfectly! > Maxi said something at least similar. So how many proofs do you need, Mister > Buesch, to finally pick up patchworking now?? How about you stopping with your fucking aggressive wording?? > > Try it again, please. > > NO! > > > And please try with current wireless-dev tree. > > A. I do not know where to download that wireless-dev tree. > B. I do not know how to implement it into mm or mainline > C. I have given enough sophisticated proof that your stuff in mm-tree is > highly incomplete / buggy. Ok, D. As you are not going to help me debugging, I am not going to fix. > > > > And I simply do not get it why you suddenly get a good IRQ number, like > > everybody else does, without fixing The Bug (tm). > > That consequence I already explained: > But it's a pleasure for me to repeat it once more: > > When you are saying Y to "EISA, VLB, PCI and on board controllers" > > you simply do get not only completely different interrupts for the b4401 > device, but you get also completely different module dependencies. That is EXPECTED and I already explained that. It is a feature. Not a bug. -- Greetings Michael. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
