Search Linux Wireless

Re: Specifing rate control algorithm?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andy Green wrote:
Sexy-sounding "hw offloading" is a very different thing to migrating off
open code and putting it in vendor-specific closed source firmware.  The
firmware is just code like any other, for an embedded ARM7 or similar,
except that it is customized for a specific vendor hardware
implementation and you will never see the sources.  What I understand is
being talked about (maybe unlike the scan stuff this actually is in
hardware, but I doubt it) is ignoring code in the stack and instead
implementing pretty much the same code privately, to compile to a binary
blob you can't see source for or even reverse according to its license.
 That is a lot less romantic than mysterious hardware just waiting to be
used.

OTOH, this is all vague, paranoid hand-waving since I'm guessing you don't know the internals of the Intel hardware.

We'll see what happens when Intel posts code to specify a different rate control algorithm.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux