This patch clarifies the comment about locking in wiphy_unregister. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Diffed for wireless-dev but applies with some offset to net-2.6.22 as well. net/wireless/core.c | 19 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- wireless-dev.orig/net/wireless/core.c 2007-04-24 20:21:02.648804911 +0200 +++ wireless-dev/net/wireless/core.c 2007-04-24 20:36:05.948804911 +0200 @@ -223,7 +223,6 @@ int wiphy_register(struct wiphy *wiphy) mutex_lock(&cfg80211_drv_mutex); - res = device_add(&drv->wiphy.dev); if (res) goto out_unlock; @@ -246,14 +245,26 @@ void wiphy_unregister(struct wiphy *wiph { struct cfg80211_registered_device *drv = wiphy_to_dev(wiphy); + /* protect the device list */ mutex_lock(&cfg80211_drv_mutex); - /* hold registered driver mutex during list removal as well - * to make sure no commands are in progress at the moment */ + BUG_ON(!list_empty(&drv->netdev_list)); + + /* + * Try to grab drv->mtx. If a command is still in progress, + * hopefully the driver will refuse it since it's tearing + * down the device already. We wait for this command to complete + * before unlinking the item from the list. + * Note: as codified by the BUG_ON above we cannot get here if + * a virtual interface is still associated. Hence, we can only + * get to lock contention here if userspace issues a command + * that identified the hardware by wiphy index. + */ mutex_lock(&drv->mtx); - list_del(&drv->list); + /* unlock again before freeing */ mutex_unlock(&drv->mtx); + list_del(&drv->list); device_del(&drv->wiphy.dev); debugfs_remove(drv->wiphy.debugfsdir); - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html