From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:53:42 +0200 > Since the discussion came up due to dropping the rtnl from wext I think > that it may be beneficial if we added rtnl locking to cfg80211 now to > simplify migration away from wext which holds rtnl and then revisit the > locking when we can drop wext completely from the mac80211 code. That > would allow us to revisit rtnl locking for wext when we have completely > migrated to cfg80211 and wext is only handled through cfg80211. > > Does that sound like an acceptable way forward? Sure. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
