Jean, > First, I'm the current active maintainer of the > wext-over-netlink interface, and nobody bothered to even 'inform' me > about its removal, let alone consult with me. I definitely should have copied you on the feature-removal schedule patch for wext-over-netlink and then the actual removal in wireless-dev; please accept my apologies for not doing that, it was not done in bad faith. It was never my intention to demote you to a "second class citizen", I'm sorry you feel that way. I have previously (and multiple times) given technical justification for removing this code (even recorded in the kernel changelog now) and I contend your allegation that it is a political issue. Others in this thread have pointed out the technical issues with wext and wext/nl so I will not repeat them. I hope that despite my mistakes in handling the wext/nl removal we will be able to work together in the future to have wext fully supported with clear semantics for backwards compatibility while the kernel internally migrates towards cfg80211. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
