On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 01:06 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 17:17 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > With phy rev == 1, the gmode bit is assumed unset when initialising a > > G PHY. Maybe that is the crucial difference. David will send me some > > backtraces of this problem, once he does I'll look at it again. > > http://david.woodhou.se/bcm43xx-mac80211.dmesg-3.txt > > The module itself is at http://david.woodhou.se/bcm43xx-mac80211.ko so > you can find line numbers where they're not immediately obvious. That was without Larry's latest patch applied. If I apply Larry's patch, we get fewer machine checks... http://david.woodhou.se/bcm43xx-mac80211-lf.dmesg.txt http://david.woodhou.se/bcm43xx-mac80211-lf.ko Strange, I thought that when I'd tested Larry's patch I was left with _no_ machine checks. Perhaps at that point I still had a printk on every PHY read or write and the machine checks were lost in the noise. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
