On Saturday 14 April 2007 17:02, Larry Finger wrote: > When I proposed a patch to fix mac80211, Michael Wu NACKed it and requested > the name changes I propose here. I don't care what names things get, but it > needs to be fixed! > If you don't care what names things get, then my patch which swaps signal and rssi assignment in bcm43xx-mac80211 is fine. If you don't like that, then you do care. I think "level" isn't very intuitive for a number that's either RSSI or dBm, however. I recommended "signal" instead which seems to better suggest a measure of signal strength/level, at least until we come up with a better statistics reporting system in cfg80211. -Michael Wu
Attachment:
pgpA6EW4ChrNF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
