On Monday 09 April 2007 17:12, Larry Finger wrote: > The code is internally consistent. Now it is only the usage of the (r)ssi > name to describe the logarithmic numbers that is confusing. Would you > entertain a patch that changed (r)ssi to level in the structs and drivers > to reduce the confusion? I have such a patch that works with > bcm43xx-mac80211. In addition, all other drivers compile. > Absolutely - it is confusing since dBm can also be specified in addition to RSSI. Renaming signal to qual or something along those lines would also be useful IMHO, but if you're okay with it as it stands, I don't mind it. -Michael Wu
Attachment:
pgpQ7ceOCAyY8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
