Again, your assumption is that he did it on purpose, and thus, you are calling him a thief. > On Thursday 05 April 2007 20:28, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > > But when dealing with a parallel open source effort, you went right to > > > > the jugular. I bet you deal nicer with companies. > > > > > > There was no deal with you! > > > > I don't understand this sentence of yours. > > There was no agreement with you to use my code. > > > Do you make deals with companies? > > Not yet. Maybe in future. Who knows... > > > Do you do those deals publically? > > That depends on what the company does. > If the company illegally distributes my code to the public, > I _will_ contact them in public as well. > > If they contact me in private _before_ distributing the code, > I will respond in private. > > The exact same thing would have been true for you. > But you did _not_ do any effort to contact me before distributing > my code. > > > What are you saying? > > > > Was Marcus suppose do to have some sort of deal with you? > > The deal was: He asks for relicensing-permission on > a particular faction of my code and I ACK or deny it. > > I explained the exact deal more than once. > > -- > Greetings Michael. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
