On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 16:22 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > "What if Broadcom decides to take our LO measure state machine and > > put it into the original driver? (The Rev Engineers told me they have > > a very different weird solution for this in their code). > > I really don't want to see this happen." > > For the record, I want to warn you that you CANNOT COPYRIGHT > A STATE MACHINE, which is what the above sentence implies. That was in a different discussion, quoted out of context. Another part of Michael's email gives some context: > bcw_phy_lo_g_state() > This exactly matches bcm43xx, although the specs only have an abstract > description and diagram of the state machine. Hence, it'd be only fair to say that he did, in fact, talk about the expression/implementation of the state machine. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
