static ieee80211_txrx_result
ieee80211_rx_h_data(struct ieee80211_txrx_data *rx)
{
@@ -4373,6 +4510,7 @@ static ieee80211_rx_handler ieee80211_rx
ieee80211_rx_h_remove_qos_control,
ieee80211_rx_h_802_1x_pae,
ieee80211_rx_h_drop_unencrypted,
+ ieee80211_rx_h_data_agg,
ieee80211_rx_h_data,
ieee80211_rx_h_mgmt,
NULL
diff -Nupr wireless-dev/net/mac80211/wme.h
wireless-dev-new/net/mac80211/wme.h
--- wireless-dev/net/mac80211/wme.h 2007-03-22 11:40:17.000000000 -0700
+++ wireless-dev-new/net/mac80211/wme.h 2007-03-27 01:48:34.000000000
-0700
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
#define QOS_CONTROL_TAG1D_MASK 0x07
+#define QOS_CONTROL_A_MSDU_PRESENT 0x80
I am calling ieee80211_rx_h_data_agg after ieee80211_rx_h_remove_qos_control which
clears all QoS data which include QOS_CONTROL_A_MSDU_PRESENT bit. We can solve this by
adding new field is_frame_agg to ieee80211_txrx_data.u.rx.is_frame_agg which will be set in
ieee80211_rx_h_parse_qos or we can add new function to ieee80211_rx_pre_handlers just to do that. the other
option is to shuffle calling sequence here if that possible to call ieee80211_rx_h_data_agg
before ieee80211_rx_h_remove_qos_control. any opinion?
Mohamed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
