On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 12:33 +0100, Andy Green wrote: > I missed this conversation evidently, didn't find it just now either. Sorry. It was on IRC. > In case the plan is to block the thread doing the injection until the > packet has gone out and is retired and can return an "acknowledged" > status direct to the send()er, throughput is an issue. I don't think that's the plan. But apparently the current interface doesn't allow userspace to exactly map the sent packet to the tx status it gets in the monitor interface (when the sent packet shows up there). I'm a bit worried that it would need such an exact mapping especially when others may be injecting frames at the same time, but I suppose that can be solved when we get to it. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
