On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 15:04 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 06:45:49PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 22:37 -0500, David Young wrote: > > > > > > One is found in the current wireless-2.6.git: > > > > > > > > IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_RX_FLAGS = 14, > > > > IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_TX_FLAGS = 15, > > > > IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_RTS_RETRIES = 16, > > > > IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_DATA_RETRIES = 17, > > > > > > These fields are slated to become part of the standard, I just haven't got > > > around to updating the manual page, yet. I have time to do that tonight. > > > > OK. I was wrong to assume that non-standard fields were introduced on > > the Linux side. > > I mentioned those in the past to David Young, but I forgot to resend > them to the radiotap list. Then we need to remove IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_FCS from Linux ieee80211_radiotap.h. It's only present in a comment, but it's a comment that can be harmful. I could submit a patch, but it would conflict with a patch that does sparse annotation. OK, I'll submit both. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
