On Wednesday 28 March 2007 13:07, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 12:59 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > > Oh, you mean virtual interfaces.. yeah, there's probably a race. I don't > > know the locking there. > > Yes, I mean virtual interfaces, when the thing is in progress while we > iterate through. > > > But my comment about the non-irqsafe-variants-should-be-hidden still applies :) > > I'll reread it ;) > > But I'm not sure I fully agree. If the driver calls __ieee80211_rx in > softirq context that should be good without requiring to reschedule in > mac80211. I'm not sure there is an easy and non-racy way to drop the driver IRQ lock while calling __ieee80211_rx synchronously. -- Greetings Michael. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
