On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 14:11 -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > This is exactly what I was pointing out earlier. Well, > actually, there may be ways of fixing it in the kernel, but that would > be real ugly, and I don't want to go there. Yeah, it would be extremely ugly and involve a lot of copying around when the app actually receives the data. > I've just released wireless_tools.29.pre15.tar.gz. This is > supposed to include a "band-aid" for that problem. To the best of my > knowledge, it should catch the problem and not introduce false > positive. I would be glad if you guys would have a quick look into it, > because obviously I can't test it. I looked at the diff between pre14 and pre15 but have to admit that I don't understand the code change. Unfortunately I can't test this until the 20th earliest so it'd be good if someone else could test this. Btw, could you look at the information leak patch I posted? We really need to get that fix (or another appropriate one) out asap. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
