On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 16:12 +0100, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > Is there any particular reason for RT2X00 to be a config only option? Not sure, maybe just preference. To me, when going through and not reading all the config entries, it appears as though rt2x00 is just a menu but selecting it still means code is built. Maybe there's the solution too, provide a new menu for all these options, rename RT2X00 to RT2X00_LIB and hide it by not providing a help text. > When RT2X00 is a config only option, it would still require RT2X00 to be a > tristate option. Good point. > It would also mean that both RT2X00 and RT2X00_LIB are options the user > can select (RT2X00_LIB depending on Rt2X00 off course), I can't really see > the point in that. No, that's not true, if RT2X00_LIB has no help text it would never show up to the user. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
