Search Linux Wireless

Re: Patch to allow specification of interface name prefix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:55:07PM -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:

> adopt eth%d convention. With SoftMAC (mac80211) things are a bit
> different -- wmaster handles 802.11 frames and wlan%d handles 802.3
> frames. The name does not matter much but it does imply at least that
> I think. As such perhaps mac80211 should change to use eth%d by
> default.

Hopefully wmaster will fall off the user's radar soon.  Regarding the
current wlanX interfaces, most modes will be using ethernet framing,
so maybe ethX is fine.  What about monitor mode?

Doesn't airo use "wifiX" for its monitor interfaces?  For monitor
interfaces, should we adopt that convention as well?

John
-- 
John W. Linville
linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux