On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 12:23 -0800, James Ketrenos wrote: > Ya, I guess that follows standard kernel guidelines more... I tend to > find it a lot easier in resolving problems with short spanning ifdef's > sprinkled in code vs. hidden functionality in header files that changes > based on CONFIG options. But alas, I think I am in the minority on that. Yeah, I guess you can argue about that. I tend to not care about what the functions do (unless I want to follow them anyway) so it's more readable that way. > I'll resend my prior 'make nl80211 optional' patch adding below to it. Great, thanks. That has my Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> then. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
