On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 08:27 -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 12:46:46PM +0100, Roger While wrote: > > > > > > > >Dan Williams (1): > > > prism54: correct assignment of DOT1XENABLE in WE-19 codepaths > > > > Where did this spring from ? > > I see no posting of this patch let alone > > an ACK. > > The patch is also doing rather more than the description - > > It is inserting extra breaks into a switch statement with > > no comment as to why. > > Dan posted it to linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 13 Feb 2007. > The description in the body is quoted below: It was also posted to stable@xxxxxxxxxx and accepted for 2.6.19 and 2.6.20. Dan > Correct assignment of DOT1XENABLE in WE-19 codepaths. > RX_UNENCRYPTED_EAPOL = 1 really means setting DOT1XENABLE _off_, and > vice versa. The original WE-19 patch erroneously reversed that. This > patch fixes association with unencrypted and WEP networks when using > wpa_supplicant. > > It also adds two missing break statements that, left out, could result > in incorrect card configuration. > > Please commit to both development and stable branches. > > Hth... > > John - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
