Linux alzette-lap1 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.i686.PAE #1 SMP Mon Apr 5 16:15:03 EDT
2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Also, above, a uname -a from my system. If I were to guess, since it is a
segfault, I would suspect the status=0x0.
Don
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Don Weeks <don.l.weeks.jr at gmail.com> wrote:
> [root at alzette-lap1 /]# gdb /bin/wimaxd core.2307
> GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora (7.0.1-43.fc12)
> Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <
> http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying"
> and "show warranty" for details.
> This GDB was configured as "i686-redhat-linux-gnu".
> For bug reporting instructions, please see:
> <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>...
> Reading symbols from /bin/wimaxd...done.
> [New Thread 2308]
> [New Thread 2309]
> [New Thread 2307]
> Missing separate debuginfo for //lib/libwimaxll.so.1
> Try: yum --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install
> /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/6b/ecef76410f0537076772bcfb08aa2172d57be4
>
> warning: .dynamic section for "//lib/libwimaxll.so.1" is not at the
> expected address
>
> warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
>
> warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libnl.so.1" is not at the expected
> address
>
> warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
>
> warning: .dynamic section for "//lib/libpthread.so.0" is not at the
> expected address
>
> warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
>
> warning: .dynamic section for "//lib/libdl.so.2" is not at the expected
> address
>
> warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
>
> warning: .dynamic section for "//lib/libc.so.6" is not at the expected
> address
>
> warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
>
> warning: .dynamic section for "//lib/libm.so.6" is not at the expected
> address
>
> warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
>
> warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/ld-linux.so.2" is not at the expected
> address
>
> warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
> Reading symbols from //lib/libwimaxll.so.1...done.
> Loaded symbols for //lib/libwimaxll.so.1
> Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libnl.so.1...(no debugging symbols
> found)...done.
> Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libnl.so.1
> Reading symbols from //lib/libpthread.so.0...(no debugging symbols
> found)...done.
> Loaded symbols for //lib/libpthread.so.0
> Reading symbols from //lib/libdl.so.2...(no debugging symbols
> found)...done.
> Loaded symbols for //lib/libdl.so.2
> Reading symbols from //lib/libc.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
> Loaded symbols for //lib/libc.so.6
> Reading symbols from //lib/libm.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
> Loaded symbols for //lib/libm.so.6
> Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...(no debugging symbols
> found)...done.
> Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
> Core was generated by `/bin/wimaxd'.
> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> #0 0x002a5b1d in pthread_timedjoin_np () from //lib/libpthread.so.0
> Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install
> filesystem-2.4.30-2.fc12.i686 glibc-2.11.1-4.i686 libnl-1.1-8.fc12.i686
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x002a5b1d in pthread_timedjoin_np () from //lib/libpthread.so.0
> #1 0x080c5c1f in wmx_timedjoin_thread (thread_id=0, milliseconds=3000,
> status=0x0) at ./wimax_osal.c:707
> #2 0x080ab6aa in l5_sockets_dispatcher_Stop () at
> ./L5SocketsDispatcher.c:264
> #3 0x0806306b in Act_Shutdown () at ./Act/Act.c:942
> #4 0x0806324b in Act_ExitThreadFunc (lpParameter=0x0) at ./Act/Act.c:213
> #5 0x002a4ab5 in start_thread () from //lib/libpthread.so.0
> #6 0x00bb6dae in clone () from //lib/libc.so.6
> (gdb)
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <
> inaky.perez-gonzalez at intel.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 13:49 -0700, Don Weeks wrote:
>> > I am getting a core dump from pthread_timedjoin_np on line 707 in
>> > wimax_osal.c The **void pointer to status is null however. BTW, this
>> > is on Fedora Core 12 and I am wondering if another release would be
>> > more valid. Before, I had this running (but never completed testing)
>> > on 64-bit Fedora Core 12 but I had used 32-bit compile flag.
>>
>> That's weird -- I got it running on FC12 (full 32 bit mode though).
>>
>> Can you provide an stack dump? and a core dump?
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxwimax.org/pipermail/wimax/attachments/20100412/f963cb66/attachment.html>
