On 5/3/24 07:54, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
Hi Conor,
On 5/2/24 19:20, Conor Dooley wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 02:59:50PM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
Krzysztof had some comments on the buck/ldo node names
I think Krzysztof pointed out that the regulator-name property should
not match the data-sheet but the board. If he had something to say about
the node names, then I've missed his comment!
and on the
initial value properties that I'm not sure if have been addressed, so
gonna leave this series to him.
Thanks for pointing out I may have missed addressing some of his
concerns. I though I fixed all issues he pointed to me but it may be I
missed some - or accidentally dropped some change(s) when merging fixes
from the 'experimental' branch to the 'simple'. I'll revise Krzysztof's
feedback to the RFC before sending the next version!
You were right Conor. I checked it and yes, I omitted a few of the fixes
to regulator bindings. Please skip reviewing this version of these
bindings, I'll handle the rest of the comments in next one!
Yours,
-- Matti
--
Matti Vaittinen
Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors
Oulu Finland
~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~
