Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] watchdog: starfive-wdt: Add JH8100 watchdog compatible string

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023/12/12 0:47, Ji Sheng Teoh wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 11:06:42 +0100
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On 09/12/2023 15:27, Ji Sheng Teoh wrote:
>> > Add "starfive,jh8100-wdt" compatible for StarFive's JH8100 watchdog.
>> > JH8100 watchdog reuses JH7110 register mapping.
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <leyfoon.tan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Ji Sheng Teoh <jisheng.teoh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c | 1 +
>> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
>> > b/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c index 5f501b41faf9..31785bb373d5
>> > 100644 --- a/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
>> > @@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops
>> > starfive_wdt_pm_ops = { static const struct of_device_id
>> > starfive_wdt_match[] = { { .compatible = "starfive,jh7100-wdt",
>> > .data = &starfive_wdt_jh7100_variant }, { .compatible =
>> > "starfive,jh7110-wdt", .data = &starfive_wdt_jh7110_variant },
>> > +	{ .compatible = "starfive,jh8100-wdt", .data =
>> > &starfive_wdt_jh7110_variant },  
>> 
>> Device is compatible, so why not expressing it in the bindings and
>> dropping this change?
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>> 
> 
> Ok, will drop this change.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ji Sheng

Hi Ji Sheng,

You can add the compatible "starfive,jh8100-wdt" in the bindings and add this:

	compatible = "starfive,jh8100-wdt", "starfive,jh7110-wdt";

in the dts. I think it would be better and does not change the driver.

Best regards,
Xingyu Wu




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux