Hi Biju,
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 6:25 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Document DA9063 watchdog device as it is similar to DA9062 watchdog.
>
> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v3->v3.1:
> * Added Ack from Conor Dooley.
> * Updated title DA9062/61->DA906{1,2,3} as it supports DA9063.
> * Retained Rb tag since the changes are trivial.
Thanks for the update!
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/dlg,da9062-watchdog.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/dlg,da9062-watchdog.yaml
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties:
> - items:
> - enum:
> - dlg,da9062-watchdog
> + - dlg,da9063-watchdog
> - items:
> - const: dlg,da9061-watchdog
> - const: dlg,da9062-watchdog
This matches the existing usage in DT, so
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
However, I believe we do have a runtime issue here, as the driver
currently matches against dlg,da9062-watchdog only, so the watchdog
must be non-functional on DA9063?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
