Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: re-order entries to match coding convention

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 09:10:44AM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 2023-11-05 19:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > The Devicetree bindings coding convention, as used in most of the files
> > and expressed in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/example-schema.yaml,
> > expects:
> > 1. "allOf:" block just before "properties:" (or after "required:" for
> >    more complex cases),
> > 2. additionalProperties/unevaluatedProperties at the end of the file,
> >    just before the examples section.
> > 
> > Re-order few schemas to match the convention to avoid repeating review
> > comments for new patches using existing code as template.  No functional
> > changes.
> 
> It's surely going to help a bit but for a long time solution maybe you
> could consider adding proper check to Rob's bot and/or checkpatch.pl.

I have such a check I wrote long ago. tools/yaml-format in dtschema. It 
just does a ruamel read and write back out so you get exactly how ruamel 
is configured or defaults to for things not configurable. Primarily, the 
non-configurable part is multi-line text without a '|'. So lots of 
'description' paragraphs are reformatted. It ends up being too strict 
IMO.

The key order is checked, but not fixed. Probably could add reordering.

Adding this by default (and to the bot) means fixing *every* file in 
tree first. That's not something I care to do and enforce.

Rob



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux