On 10/21/23 03:57, fenghui wrote:
ret is assigned first, so it does not need to initialize the assignment.
Signed-off-by: fenghui <fenghui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c
index 5b55ccae06d4..dceaf5cc89fd 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static int watchdog_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long mode,
void *data)
{
struct watchdog_device *wdd;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
wdd = container_of(nb, struct watchdog_device, pm_nb);
NACK
Complete code:
static int watchdog_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long mode,
void *data)
{
struct watchdog_device *wdd;
int ret = 0;
wdd = container_of(nb, struct watchdog_device, pm_nb);
switch (mode) {
case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE:
case PM_RESTORE_PREPARE:
case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
ret = watchdog_dev_suspend(wdd);
break;
case PM_POST_HIBERNATION:
case PM_POST_RESTORE:
case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
ret = watchdog_dev_resume(wdd);
break;
}
if (ret)
return NOTIFY_BAD;
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
ret is not set in the default: case.
I don't know what this is about; you have submitted two patches
in a row, both of which would introduce a problem if accepted.
Is this a test ? Either case, please refrain from submitting
such patches in the future.
Guenter