Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] watchdog: iTCO_wdg: Make code more clearly with macro definition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 11:35:20AM +0800, Liu Xinpeng wrote:
> @@ -596,7 +596,6 @@ static int iTCO_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>  /*
>   * Suspend-to-idle requires this, because it stops the ticks and timekeeping, so
>   * the watchdog cannot be pinged while in that state.  In ACPI sleep states the
> @@ -637,20 +636,15 @@ static int iTCO_wdt_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
>  }
>  
>  static const struct dev_pm_ops iTCO_wdt_pm = {
> -	.suspend_noirq = iTCO_wdt_suspend_noirq,
> -	.resume_noirq = iTCO_wdt_resume_noirq,
> +	SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(iTCO_wdt_suspend_noirq,
> +				      iTCO_wdt_resume_noirq)

Thus, iTCO_wdt_suspend_noirq and iTCO_wdt_resume_noirq are possible unused.
Put __maybe_unused attribute to them.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux