Re: [PATCH 1/9] watchdog: of_xilinx_wdt: Add comment to spinlock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/15/21 3:46 AM, Srinivas Neeli wrote:
> From: Srinivas Goud <srinivas.goud@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Based on checkpatch every spinlock should be documented.
> The patch is fixing this issue:
> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict -f drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
> CHECK: spinlock_t definition without comment
> +	spinlock_t spinlock;
> 
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Goud <srinivas.goud@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
> index 7fe4f7c3f7ce..00549164b3d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
>  struct xwdt_device {
>  	void __iomem *base;
>  	u32 wdt_interval;
> -	spinlock_t spinlock;
> +	spinlock_t spinlock; /* spinlock for register handling */
>  	struct watchdog_device xilinx_wdt_wdd;
>  	struct clk		*clk;
>  };
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux