From: linux-watchdog-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-watchdog-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 5:18 PM To: Timothy Myers <timothy.myers@xxxxxxxxxx>; Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; David Boike <david.boike@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] watchdog: Add common nowayout parameter to booke_wdt driver On 7/6/20 9:33 AM, Timothy Myers wrote: >> Add the common "nowayout" parameter to booke_wdt to make this behavior >> selectable at runtime and to make the implementation more consistent with >> many other watchdog drivers. >> >> Signed-off-by: Timothy Myers <timothy.myers@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Changes in: >> v2: >> Added Guenter Roeck's reviewed-by tag at his request >> v3: >> Fix whitespace formatting in message. >> --- > >Change log goes here. > >I applied your patch to watchdog-next, but there is still something >in it which prevents it from showing up at >https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-watchdog/list/, even though >I do see it at https://lore.kernel.org/linux-watchdog/. > >Looking into the e-mail source, I think the problem may be due >to some Outlook specific formatting in the raw message: > >Add the common "nowayout" parameter to booke_wdt to make this behavior=0A= >selectable at runtime and to make the implementation more consistent with= >=0A= >many other watchdog drivers.=0A= >=0A= > >and so on. If that is persistent, it may make sense to fix it, or >you might wonder why some of your patches are being ignored. > >Thanks, >Guenter Thank you for applying the patch, and thank you again for your help with my mail. I'll look into the formatting.
