Hi Andy, Guenter, Did you understand to which branch it will be better to take this patchset? Thanks, Michael. > -----Original Message----- > From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 7:14 PM > To: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Michael Shych <michaelsh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux- > watchdog.org>; Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Darren Hart > <dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Platform Driver > <platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Vadim Pasternak > <vadimp@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] support watchdog with longer timeout period > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 7:09 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 5/4/20 7:14 AM, michaelsh@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > From: Michael Shych <michaelsh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Michael Shych (4): > > > platform_data/mlxreg: support new watchdog type with longer timeout > > > period > > > platform/x86: mlx-platform: support new watchdog type with longer > > > timeout > > > watchdog: mlx-wdt: support new watchdog type with longer timeout > > > period > > > docs: watchdog: mlx-wdt: Add description of new watchdog type 3 > > > > > > Documentation/watchdog/mlx-wdt.rst | 10 ++++ > > > drivers/platform/x86/mlx-platform.c | 106 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > drivers/watchdog/mlx_wdt.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++---- > > > include/linux/platform_data/mlxreg.h | 5 +- > > > Guess the big question is now which branch to use to take this series. > > Thoughts, anyone ? > > count(watchdog) = 8 > count(platform) = 6 > > Thoughts? > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko
