Re: wdat_wdt: access width inconsistency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 12:47:47 +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:30:30AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > (The underlying question being: can I get rid of that ALIGN()
> > altogether while fixing the gas->access_width misuse bug?)  
> 
> I think the ALIGN() was there just because I did not realize that
> access_width is 3 and not 4 for 32-bit memory. So it is not needed.
> 
> I actually have a patch series that should fix this and the other issue
> you found (I found a couple of spare cycles in the morning) so if you
> don't mind I'll submit them soon.

Sure please do, I don't care about ownership, I only want these bugs to
be fixed. I got myself side-tracked by another issue at work this
morning.

I'll be happy to review your changes.

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux