On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 07:34:49PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote: > > > Le ven. 9 août 2019 à 19:29, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > >On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 06:55:26PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote: > >> Hi Guenter, > >> > >> > >> Le ven. 9 août 2019 à 18:52, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit > >>: > >> >On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:59:27PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote: > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> This patchset comes from a bigger patchset that was cut in smaller > >> >> pieces for easier integration to mainline. > >> >> (The patchset was https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/27/1837) > >> >> > >> >> The reviews were kept since the code mostly didn't change. The > >> >>exception > >> >> is the use of device_node_to_regmap() in patch 2/3. This function > >>was > >> >> added in a prior patch, now merged in the MIPS tree. > >> >> > >> >> For that reason this patchset is based on the ingenic-tcu-v5.4 > >>branch > >> >>of > >> >> the MIPS tree > >> >> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mips/linux.git). > >> >> > >> > > >> >What is the expectation here ? Should the series be sent upstream > >> >through the watchdog tree, or through some other tree ? > >> > >> You can get it through the watchdog tree if you merge the > >>ingenic-tcu-v5.4 > >> branch from the MIPS tree. If you'd rather not do that, I can get it > >>merged > >> through the MIPS tree. > >> > >I would prefer a merge through the mips tree. > > > >Guenter > > Ok; Can I get some signatures then? ;) > They are already tagged with my Reviewed-by:. Do you want an Acked-by: as well ? Sure, no problem. Guenter
