Re: iTCO_wdt on Intel NUC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 06:55:57AM +0200, Valentin Vidić wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 05:05:17PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Most likely the memory region is reserved/used by something else. /proc/iomem
> > might show you.
> 
> The output is a bit strange since it mentions iTCO_wdt for that address range:
> 
> [    9.377397] iTCO_wdt iTCO_wdt: can't request region for resource [mem 0x00c5fffc-0x00c5ffff]
> 
> 00000000-00000fff : Reserved
> 00001000-0009efff : System RAM
> 0009f000-000fffff : Reserved
>   000a0000-000bffff : PCI Bus 0000:00
>   000e0000-000e3fff : PCI Bus 0000:00
>   000e4000-000e7fff : PCI Bus 0000:00
>   000e8000-000ebfff : PCI Bus 0000:00
>   000ec000-000effff : PCI Bus 0000:00
>   000f0000-000fffff : System ROM
> 00100000-6f8d8017 : System RAM
>   00c5fffc-00c5ffff : iTCO_wdt
> 6f8d8018-6f8e8e57 : System RAM
> 6f8e8e58-79d52fff : System RAM
> 79d53000-7a1bdfff : Reserved
> 7a1be000-7a23afff : ACPI Tables
> 7a23b000-7a2ebfff : ACPI Non-volatile Storage
> 7a2ec000-7ac0dfff : Reserved
> 7ac0e000-7ac0efff : System RAM
> 7ac0f000-7fffffff : Reserved
>   7c000000-7fffffff : Graphics Stolen Memory
> 

Weird. Is iTCO_wdt instantiated twice ?

I have no idea how to proceed, sorry.

Guenter



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux