Re: [PATCH v2 06/16] watchdog: hpwdt: drop warning after calling watchdog_init_timeout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/24/19 1:38 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Wolfram,

On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 9:46 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, that works as well. Note that it will actually print something like
"watchdog: <device>: ..." due to the pr_fmt() at the top of watchdog_core.c.
I guess that should be ok.

I have the following diff applied on top of patch 2. Works with and
without a parent device. I am not super happy casting 'identity' but
since its u8-type is exported to userspace, I think we can't avoid it.
Guenter, is this cast safe? Here is the diff:

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c
index cd3ca6b366ef..62be9e52a4de 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c
@@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ static void watchdog_check_min_max_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
  int watchdog_init_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
                                 unsigned int timeout_parm, struct device *dev)
  {
+       const char *dev_str = wdd->parent ? dev_name(wdd->parent) :
+                             (const char *)wdd->info->identity;

     struct watchdog_info {
             ...
             __u8  identity[32];     /* Identity of the board */
     };

Is identity[] guaranteed to be NUL-terminated?


I would hope so, because we export its contents via sysfs to userspace
with
	return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", wdd->info->identity);

Also, there are already several pr_err() assuming that it is
a string,

Guenter



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux