> > Is the intent of the proposed changes to prevent the unload of > > a module if it was loaded with the "nowayout" parameter? > > > > If so, I thought the WD "nowayout" semantic was only supposed to be in effect > > after /dev/watchdog was opened. The proposed change looks like it makes the > > "nowayout" semantic take effect before /dev/watchdog is opened. > > Thanks, that's IMHO a very valid point. I agree, thanks for this input.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
