RE: [PATCH 1/2] watchdog: da9063: rename helper function to avoid misunderstandings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Marco,

On 04 June 2018 10:43, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] watchdog: da9063: rename helper function to avoid misunderstandings
> 
> _da9063_wdt_set_timeout() is called by da9063_wdt_set_timeout(),
> da9063_wdt_start() and da9063_wdt_probe() but the name expect only to be
> called by da9063_wdg_set_timeout(). Rename the function to avoid
> misunderstandings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/watchdog/da9063_wdt.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/da9063_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/da9063_wdt.c
> index a4380a887e85..760aa9bca81b 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/da9063_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/da9063_wdt.c
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static int da9063_wdt_disable_timer(struct da9063 *da9063)
>  				  DA9063_TWDSCALE_DISABLE);
>  }
> 
> -static int _da9063_wdt_set_timeout(struct da9063 *da9063, unsigned int regval)
> +static int da9063_wdt_update_timeout(struct da9063 *da9063, unsigned int
> regval)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> 
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static int da9063_wdt_start(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
>  	int ret;
> 
>  	selector = da9063_wdt_timeout_to_sel(wdd->timeout);
> -	ret = _da9063_wdt_set_timeout(da9063, selector);
> +	ret = da9063_wdt_update_timeout(da9063, selector);
>  	if (ret)
>  		dev_err(da9063->dev, "Watchdog failed to start (err = %d)\n",
>  			ret);
> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static int da9063_wdt_set_timeout(struct
> watchdog_device *wdd,
>  	 * enabling the watchdog, so the timeout must be buffered by the driver.
>  	 */
>  	if (watchdog_active(wdd))
> -		ret = _da9063_wdt_set_timeout(da9063, selector);
> +		ret = da9063_wdt_update_timeout(da9063, selector);
> 
>  	if (ret)
>  		dev_err(da9063->dev, "Failed to set watchdog timeout (err =
> %d)\n",
> @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static int da9063_wdt_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
>  		unsigned int timeout;
> 
>  		timeout =
> da9063_wdt_timeout_to_sel(DA9063_WDG_TIMEOUT);
> -		_da9063_wdt_set_timeout(da9063, timeout);
> +		da9063_wdt_update_timeout(da9063, timeout);
>  		set_bit(WDOG_HW_RUNNING, &wdd->status);
>  	}
> 
> --
> 2.17.1

What kernel did you use for this please?
I get the following patch warnings when applying to v4.17:

patching file drivers/watchdog/da9063_wdt.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 45 with fuzz 2 (offset -19 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 58 (offset -35 lines).
Hunk #3 FAILED at 148.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 223.
2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/watchdog/da9063_wdt.c.rej

Regards,
Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux