Re: [PATCH 3/5] watchdog: sp805: set WDOG_HW_RUNNING when appropriate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 18-05-22 04:24 PM, Ray Jui wrote:
Hi Guenter,

On 5/22/2018 1:54 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:47:18AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote:
If the watchdog hardware is already enabled during the boot process,
when the Linux watchdog driver loads, it should reset the watchdog and
tell the watchdog framework. As a result, ping can be generated from
the watchdog framework, until the userspace watchdog daemon takes over
control

Signed-off-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Olovyannikov <vladimir.olovyannikov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/watchdog/sp805_wdt.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sp805_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/sp805_wdt.c
index 1484609..408ffbe 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/sp805_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/sp805_wdt.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
      /* control register masks */
      #define    INT_ENABLE    (1 << 0)
      #define    RESET_ENABLE    (1 << 1)
+    #define    ENABLE_MASK    (INT_ENABLE | RESET_ENABLE)
  #define WDTINTCLR        0x00C
  #define WDTRIS            0x010
  #define WDTMIS            0x014
@@ -74,6 +75,18 @@ module_param(nowayout, bool, 0);
  MODULE_PARM_DESC(nowayout,
          "Set to 1 to keep watchdog running after device release");
  +/* returns true if wdt is running; otherwise returns false */
+static bool wdt_is_running(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
+{
+    struct sp805_wdt *wdt = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdd);
+
+    if ((readl_relaxed(wdt->base + WDTCONTROL) & ENABLE_MASK) ==
+        ENABLE_MASK)
+        return true;
+    else
+        return false;

    return !!(readl_relaxed(wdt->base + WDTCONTROL) & ENABLE_MASK));


Note ENABLE_MASK contains two bits (INT_ENABLE and RESET_ENABLE); therefore, a simple !!(expression) would not work? That is, the masked result needs to be compared against the mask again to ensure both bits are set, right?
Ray - your original code looks correct to me.  Easier to read and less prone to errors as shown in the attempted translation to a single statement.

Thanks,

Ray

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux