[PATCH v2] watchdog: dw_wdt: fix overflow issue in dw_wdt_top_in_seconds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If top is 15, (1 << (16 + top)) may be negative.

Signed-off-by: Huibin Hong <huibin.hong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

Changes in v2:
    - Rebase mainline Linux 4.13-rc5

 drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
index 36be987..59ed958 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
@@ -72,7 +72,9 @@ static inline int dw_wdt_top_in_seconds(struct dw_wdt *dw_wdt, unsigned top)
 	 * There are 16 possible timeout values in 0..15 where the number of
 	 * cycles is 2 ^ (16 + i) and the watchdog counts down.
 	 */
-	return (1U << (16 + top)) / dw_wdt->rate;
+	unsigned int cycles = 1 << (16 + top);
+
+	return (cycles / clk_get_rate(dw_wdt.clk));
 }
 
 static int dw_wdt_get_top(struct dw_wdt *dw_wdt)
-- 
1.9.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux