Re: [PATCH v23 06/11] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: refactor MMIO timer probing.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 01:51:00AM +0800, fu.wei@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> +	arch_timer_mem_freq = arch_timer_mem_get_cntfrq(base);
> +	if (!arch_timer_rate && arch_timer_mem_freq) {
> +		arch_timer_rate = arch_timer_mem_freq;
> +	} else if (!arch_timer_rate || arch_timer_rate != arch_timer_mem_freq) {
> +		pr_err(FW_BUG "invalid MMIO frequency.\n");
> +		iounmap(base);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}

I thought I had previously mentioned that this last check has the
potential to break DT systems, which may be inadvertently relying on the
probe order.

I agree we must do this check for ACPI, but I think that for DT it needs
to be relaxed.

I'm happy to rework that locally, if you can address my comments on
patch 9.

Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux