Re: [PATCH 3/8] watchdog: wm831x watchdog really needs mfd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:48:27PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:36 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>>  config WM831X_WATCHDOG
> >>>       tristate "WM831x watchdog"
> >>> -     depends on MFD_WM831X || COMPILE_TEST
> >>> +     depends on MFD_WM831X
> >>
> >> I prefer the fix proposed by Randy:
> >>
> >> -       depends on MFD_WM831X || COMPILE_TEST
> >> +       depends on MFD_WM831X || (MFD_WM831X=y && COMPILE_TEST)
> >>
> >
> > Agreed, that's better.
> 
> Actually I misread. They should be completely equivalent, the part after
> the || has no effect here.
> 
Yes, I figured that out later as well.

Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux