Re: Stopping watchdog in watchdog driver remove functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Given that, does it even make sense to stop the watchdog in the remove
>> function ?
>> Should it even be permitted ?
>
> From an API point of view: if WDIOF_MAGICCLOSE is being used then the watchdog
> _SHOULD_ continue to run when the watchdog was not properly closed (which
> normally also results in a reboot of the system).

Btw, some systems may require watchdog to be run in order to perform reboot.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux