Re: [RFC 3/3] watchdog: introduce CONFIG_WATCHDOG_OPEN_DEADLINE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2016-07-14 16:42, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 07/14/2016 02:16 AM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:

+config WATCHDOG_OPEN_DEADLINE
+    bool "Allow deadline for opening watchdog device"
+    help
+      If a watchdog driver indicates that to the framework that
+      the hardware watchdog is running, the framework takes care
+      of pinging the watchdog until userspace opens
+      /dev/watchdogN. By selecting this option, you can set a
+      maximum time for which the kernel will do this after the
+      device has been registered.
+
+config WATCHDOG_OPEN_TIMEOUT
+    int "Timeout value for opening watchdog device"
+    depends on WATCHDOG_OPEN_DEADLINE
+    default 120000
+    help
+      The maximum time, in milliseconds, for which the watchdog
+      framework takes care of pinging a watchdog device. A value
+      of 0 means infinite. The value set here can be overridden by
+      the commandline parameter "watchdog.open_timeout" or through
+      sysfs.
+

I like the basic idea, and we always thought about implementing it,
though as "initial timeout" (I personally preferred that term).

I also used WATCHDOG_INIT_TIMEOUT in my first few drafts, and my helper watchdog_set_open_deadline was called watchdog_set_init_timeout. But then I stumbled on watchdog_init_timeout in watchdog_core.c, and thought that might end up being quite confusing. I think having 'open' part of the name is quite natural, but I don't really have strong feelings about the naming of this thing.

However, implementing it as configuration option diminishes its
value substantially, since it means that using it in multi-platform
images (such as multi_v7_defconfig) becomes impossible.

If one wants to allow this feature in an existing _defconfig, one can set OPEN_DEADLINE=y and OPEN_TIMEOUT=0; we could change the default for the latter to that. (I thought about just having that single config option with a default of 0, but it wasn't much more code to allow this thing to be compiled out completely.) Platforms without a running watchdog won't be affected, and for those with, having a non-zero deadline requires opt-in anyway.

The initial timeout should be specified as module option or as
devicetree parameter, and there should be no additional configuration
option.

I was under the impression that device tree was exclusively for describing hardware, and this certainly is not that. I also wanted to avoid having to modify each driver, which would seem to be necessary if it was module parameter/DT - the only thing required of a driver now is that it correctly reports WDOG_HW_RUNNING.

Regardless of implementation, it's not something that any "distro" kernel is going to enable (with non-zero deadline), so to use it will require some customization - which could be a .config tweak, passing a command line parameter, a custom dtb, and probably other options. ISTM that the first two are the most generic and require the least repeated work across platforms.

Where does the module parameter in watchdog_dev.c end up ?

# cat /sys/module/watchdog/parameters/open_timeout
120000

Rasmus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux