Indeed, it make sense. I will fix this on v5. Thanks a lot for your valuable feedbacks on this patch. JB On Mon, 8 Jun 2015 12:35:11 -0700 Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/06/2015 03:25 PM, Jean-Baptiste Theou wrote: > > Currently, watchdog subsystem require the misc subsystem to > > register a watchdog. This may not be the case in case of an > > early registration of a watchdog, which can be required when > > the watchdog cannot be disabled. > > > > This patch introduces a deferral mechanism to remove this requirement. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Baptiste Theou <jtheou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Changes in v4: > > - Adjust patch based on Guenter feedbacks on v3 > > > > You still have lines with > 80 columns, primarily because of very long > variable names. I would suggest to pick shorter names - there is no > technical reason for variables named watchdog_deferred_registration_XXX, > and I don't see why we should have checkpatch warnings just because > of long variable names. > > Also, multi-line alignment is still not correct. > I would suggest to run the patch through checkpatch --strict. > > Thanks, > Guenter > -- Jean-Baptiste Theou <jtheou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
