Thanks for the feedback. I tested a version before cleanup, and the mistake was introduce during it. It's my mistake, sorry about that. Will fix it on v4. On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 16:11:18 +0200 Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2015-06-06 at 14:56 +0200, Valentin Rothberg wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 12:03:06PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > > > On Sat, 2015-06-06 at 00:46 -0700, Jean-Baptiste Theou wrote: > > > > +#ifdef GPIO_WATCHDOG_ARCH_INITCALL > > > > > > You meant > > > #ifdef CONFIG_GPIO_WATCHDOG_ARCH_INITCALL > > > > > > Please use scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py. > > > > checkkconfigsymbols.py only checks CONFIG_ prefix symbols. Since this > > prefix is missing here, the script would not complain. > > Of course. Thanks for correcting me. > > > But that's an interesting case and worth checking for. > > Perhaps. Depends on the amount of false positives that such checks would > trigger, I'd say. > > > Paul Bolle > -- Jean-Baptiste Theou <jtheou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
