Re: [PATCHv7 8/8] watchdog: omap_wdt: Convert to use new core extensions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04.05.2015 10:04, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello Timo,

On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 08:59:03AM +0300, Timo Kokkonen wrote:
Hi, 03.05.2015 21:56, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 02:11:42PM +0300, Timo Kokkonen wrote:
+static int omap_wdt_is_running(struct omap_wdt_dev *wdev)
+{
+	void __iomem *base = wdev->base;
+
+	return readl_relaxed(base + OMAP_WATCHDOG_SPR) == 0x4444;
+}
This isn't reliable. The sequence needed to enable the watchdog is
	writel(0xbbbb, base + OMAP_WATCHDOG_SPR);
	writel(0x4444, base + OMAP_WATCHDOG_SPR);

The sequence to stop is:
	writel(0xaaaa, base + OMAP_WATCHDOG_SPR);
	writel(0x5555, base + OMAP_WATCHDOG_SPR);

But:

barebox@TI AM335x BeagleBone black:/ md 0x44e35048+4
44e35048: 00005555                                           UU..
barebox@TI AM335x BeagleBone black:/ mw 0x44e35048 0x4444
barebox@TI AM335x BeagleBone black:/ md 0x44e35048+4
44e35048: 00004444                                           DD..

So the register contains 0x4444 but the timer doesn't run. So at best
testing for 0x4444 is a good heuristic.

Yeah.. I don't think we can get any better than that. Unless we
start checking the counter register and see whether it really counts
or not, and I think that's a bit overkill.. So I'd say we should be
safe when assuming bootloader is doing things correctly. Although,
we could add a comment to the code that the test may not be 100%
reliable in case the start sequence have not been issued properly.

Thanks for pointing this out!
It doesn't seem to much overhead to do:

	/*
	 * There is no register that tells us if the timer is running,
	 * so we have to resort to sample twice. The minimal frequency
	 * is 256 Hz (32768 Hz prescaled with 2**7).
	 */
	counter1 = readl(base + OMAP_WATCHDOG_CCR);
	mdelay(4);
	counter2 = readl(base + OMAP_WATCHDOG_CCR);
	return counter1 != counter2;

I'd say it's even worth to do:

	cntrl = readl(base + OMAP_WATCHDOG_CNTRL);
	if (cntrl & (1 << 5))
		shift = (cntrl >> 2) & 0x7;
	else
		shift = 0;
	counter1 = readl(base + OMAP_WATCHDOG_CCR);
	udelay(31 << shift);
	counter2 = readl(base + OMAP_WATCHDOG_CCR);
	return counter1 != counter2;

For some bonus points add some defines for the magic constants.

This is save as the OMAP_WATCHDOG_CNTRL doesn't seem to accept reads
while the counter is running. Maybe even this could be used to detect a
running timer?:

Maybe, but you will get a data abort when the HW doesn't accept a read. How do you recover from that?

Also, it seems that for some reason the watchdog HW is very picky about which registers can be read in what condition. If I add the code to read watchdog counter register, I will get a data abort later at the end of the probe when the watchdog revision is read. I don't understand why that happens, this does not seem logica. Maybe it has got something to do with the fact that the watchdog is stopped? If I can't read the counter register, I can't really implement the above heuristic.. Any ideas?

-Timo


  - enable timer:
	barebox@TI AM335x BeagleBone black:/ mw 0x44e35048 0xbbbb
	barebox@TI AM335x BeagleBone black:/ mw 0x44e35048 0x4444

  - read out WCLR
	barebox@TI AM335x BeagleBone black:/ md 0x44e35024+4
	44e35024: 00000020                                            ...

  - write to WCLR
	barebox@TI AM335x BeagleBone black:/ mw 0x44e35024 0x0

  - check result; didn't work
	barebox@TI AM335x BeagleBone black:/ md 0x44e35024+4
	44e35024: 00000020                                            ...

  - stop timer
	barebox@TI AM335x BeagleBone black:/ mw 0x44e35048 0xaaaa
	barebox@TI AM335x BeagleBone black:/ mw 0x44e35048 0x5555

  - recheck WCLR
	barebox@TI AM335x BeagleBone black:/ md 0x44e35024+4
	44e35024: 00000020                                            ...

  - write to WCLR
	barebox@TI AM335x BeagleBone black:/ mw 0x44e35024 0x0

  - check result; write succeeded
	barebox@TI AM335x BeagleBone black:/ md 0x44e35024+4
	44e35024: 00000000                                           ....

(This is was tested on an AM335x.)

Best regards
Uwe


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux