Re: [PATCH] watchdog: introduce the ARM64 SBSA watchdog driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/01/2015 12:59 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
You are saying that pretty much everyone in the kernel is, in your opinion,
doing the Wrong Thing (tm) and you insist in doing it differently.

No, of course not, it's just that I've written code like this many times, and no one else ever complained about my error messages before.

As maintainer, I have seen lots of patches which remove this very same error
checking as unnecessary. If we accept your code, we can be all but sure to
see such a patch at some point, probably right after your patch was accepted
and shows up in linux-next. So besides arguing about something we should not
have to argue about in the first place, you are trying to create even more
maintainer work going forward.

Ok, ok! I'll remove it. I just trying to understand the rationale. I don't agree with it, but I'll make the change you want.

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux