Re: watchdog timeout in sub-seconds?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/13/2015 06:33 AM, Alexander Stein wrote:
Hi,

is there a specific reason that the timeout in the linux watchdog drivers is
only provided in seconds resolution? What about timeouts in ms area/precision?


The question would probably be why not. On a loaded system, sub-second
watchdog timeouts are quite unreasonable.

In other words, you would have to provide a very good argument for
sub-second timeouts if you see the need for it. That some hardware
may require it is not really an argument here - this is all about
user space - kernel interface, not about limitations of specific
hardware.

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux