Re: [PATCH] watchdog: bcm47xx_wdt.c: add restart handler support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/24/2015 08:45 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 24 January 2015 at 17:32, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 01/24/2015 05:47 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:

Just like in case of other watchdog drivers, use the new kernel core
API to provide restart support.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/watchdog/bcm47xx_wdt.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/bcm47xx_wdt.c
b/drivers/watchdog/bcm47xx_wdt.c
index 9816485..dac3c5d 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/bcm47xx_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/bcm47xx_wdt.c
@@ -169,6 +169,17 @@ static int bcm47xx_wdt_notify_sys(struct
notifier_block *this,
         return NOTIFY_DONE;
   }

+static int bcm47xx_wdt_restart(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long
mode,
+                              void *cmd)
+{
+       struct bcm47xx_wdt *wdt;
+
+       wdt = container_of(this, struct bcm47xx_wdt, restart_handler);
+       wdt->timer_set(wdt, 1);
+
+       return NOTIFY_DONE;
+}
+
   static struct watchdog_ops bcm47xx_wdt_soft_ops = {
         .owner          = THIS_MODULE,
         .start          = bcm47xx_wdt_soft_start,
@@ -204,20 +215,27 @@ static int bcm47xx_wdt_probe(struct platform_device
*pdev)
         watchdog_set_nowayout(&wdt->wdd, nowayout);

         wdt->notifier.notifier_call = &bcm47xx_wdt_notify_sys;
-
         ret = register_reboot_notifier(&wdt->notifier);
         if (ret)
                 goto err_timer;

-       ret = watchdog_register_device(&wdt->wdd);
+       wdt->restart_handler.notifier_call = &bcm47xx_wdt_restart;
+       wdt->restart_handler.priority = 128;


This should be low priority since it doesn't immediately restart the system
but uses a watchdog timeout.

I think this is also the only way to reboot Broadcom device. Is there
some howto on values I should use? Should I change it to sth like 64?
Or what number?


64 is fine.

You never know if someone using that chip implements, for example, reset
with a gpio pin.

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux