On Wednesday 23 April 2014 17:04:36 Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> -static void __init sunxi_dt_init(void)
> -{
> - of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
> -}
> -
> -static const char * const sunxi_board_dt_compat[] = {
> - "allwinner,sun4i-a10",
> - "allwinner,sun5i-a10s",
> - "allwinner,sun5i-a13",
> - NULL,
> -};
> -
> -DT_MACHINE_START(SUNXI_DT, "Allwinner A1X (Device Tree)")
> - .init_machine = sunxi_dt_init,
> - .dt_compat = sunxi_board_dt_compat,
> -MACHINE_END
> -
> static const char * const sun6i_board_dt_compat[] = {
> "allwinner,sun6i-a31",
> NULL,
I'd like to hear more opinions on this. We could either rely
on the generic code, or we could keep the entry with just
the .dt_compat line and the name, so /proc/cpuinfo contains
a meaningful platform name.
Either approach works for me, but I think we should do this
consistent across platforms. Olof, do you have an opinion?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
