On 02/06/2014 11:25 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 02/05/2014 10:25 PM, Stanislav Kholmanskikh wrote:
Hi!
On 01/27/2014 08:33 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:04:33AM +0400, Stanislav Kholmanskikh wrote:
Most WDT driver modules return ENODEV during modprobe if
no valid device was found, but w83697hf_wdt returns EIO.
Let w83697hf_wdt return ENODEV.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kholmanskikh
<stanislav.kholmanskikh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thank you.
I'm a newbie here.
Should I do something to move it forward (like send this to an another
mail list), or just wait? :)
Just wait. I'll apply it to my tree and send a reminder to Wim at some
point.
Usually Wim is pretty good at picking things up himself, though.
Of course, fun part in this case is that I actually submitted a patch
to remove this driver ;-). Not as bad as it sounds - reason was that
the w83627hf driver now supports the w83697hf as well, and the w83697hf
driver is thus redundant. I can understand Wim if he wants to keep
the driver around for a while, though.
Ok. Got it.
Both outcomes are good for me :)
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
