On 01/15/14 at 11:55am, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:15:56PM +0000, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: > > > watchdog and crash dump really conflicts to some degree, from the watchdog > > > point of view it can reboot system whhen kdump kernel hangs. But from kdump > > > point of view it want ensure saving the vmcore for later debugging. > > > > > > Maybe we can only select only one in this case. > > > > You want to be able to make a decision at runtime which to use. > > > > > > - if it can be stopped, you can open and stop it > > > > > > For the last one since crashing happens we have no chance to open and stop. > > > > When you decide you need to set up to catch a core rather than just > > crash you can open and stop the watchdog (if supported), and you can then > > set up for a kdump and then at some point later if it crashes capture the > > dump. > > Disabling watchdog if kdump serice starts will not make many happy. If > kernel hangs, we don't have a functionality to reboot it. > > What about other idea of keeping watchdog interval long enough that new > kernel can boot, driver can load and then new driver/user space can > continue to kick the watchdog. And if second kernel hangs, watchdog will > reboot the system. I would agree this way. Thanks Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html